Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Recent Reads


Scarlet by A. C. Gaughen (2012). What bookish girl doesn't fall in love with Robin Hood at a fairly young age? I've been fascinated by the legend of Robin Hood since I first read Howard Pyle's The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood of his exploits when I was eleven or so. I loved that book and reread it often. Years later when my parents took us to England for vacation the summer after I turned fifteen, we decided we had to go to Sherwood Forest. It was there that I learned, to my supreme disappointment, that Robin Hood was just a legend. (I wonder why I thought he was real?) This book is a reworking of the Robin Hood legend from the standpoint of a knife-wielding, female "Will" Scarlet, disguised as a boy. I'm not sure how I feel about this book. For sheer entertainment value, it did pretty well. With a few exceptions, I stayed interested in seeing what was going to happen. I mostly liked the characterizations, although I personally don't think the strength of Robin's character features very clearly. Little John features a little too much. I didn't care for him. The story has good action, but the plot is a little lacking, and had too many repeats of the same incident (Scarlet sneaking into somewhere to snoop or free people and getting beat up/wounded in the process), just tweaked a little. I also didn't like the love triangle going on. I think it was relied on too heavily as a plot device, and the many jealousy scenes got old. (I get so tired of love triangles in YA fiction.) But for all my little peeves, it was a very decent read.

My cousin Suey of It's All About Books brought this one to my attention. (Clicking on the website link will take you to her enthusiastic review.)

For a better retelling, read Robin McKinley's The Outlaws of Sherwood. Apart from the Pyle book, it's probably my favorite. It's suitable for readers as young as eight.


Why Gender Matters by Leonard Sax (2005). I read this one on the recommendation of a speaker at the last homeschool convention I attended. The book discusses the differences in the male and female brains and the author draws some conclusions about the ramifications of those differences. I'm not sure what I feel about it. I think that the common trend for gender-sameness in public schools is problematic, especially for boys. (By "gender-sameness" I mean the idea that there are no physiological or chemical differences -besides the obvious glandular and hormonal ones- in boys and girls and how they learn best.) I'm not sure I would draw the same conclusions he does in some instances regarding what to do about those gender differences, especially in regard to those children he terms "anomalous." But the book makes for fascinating reading.


Pippi Longstocking by Astrid Lindgren. (Unabdridged Audiobook, read by Esther Benson) I had only a vague recollection of this book, centering exclusively around Pippi herself, her little monkey Mr. Nilsson, and the horse on the porch. I do remember one of my elementary school teachers reading it aloud, but I couldn't for the life of me remember anything of plots or stories. Since it's a childhood classic, I have long been toying with the idea of reading it aloud to my girls, but other, more interesting books have always gotten in the way. We found the audiobook at the library and decided to get it to listen to during our about-town errands. Esther Benson does a good job with the narration, but I have to confess that I'm not a fan of the story. It's like nails on a chalkboard. And I know why I remember almost nothing about it. There's not much there to remember. My feelings can be summed up by my seven-year-old Karina's comment, "For all her travels, she's not very smart, is she?" For all her wildness and shenanigans, she's also not that interesting. I can only attribute the book's lasting impact being due to the wildly outrageous, non-conformist main character, because everything else about it, including the "adventures," is boring. And why, for being as old as she is, does she never learn from her social gaffes? Her wide-eyed, quasi-innocent, "isn't-this-jolly" preciousness (as my grandmother would have said) is nauseating and irritating. Her wildly braggadocio lies aren't even very interesting. This is one book I won't be adding to our personal library. If my children end up loving it down the road ('though they don't seem very keen on it at present) they can buy it with their own money. So there.

10 comments:

  1. any book by robin mckinley gets a thumb up from me..i had just finished "outlaws" when that robin hood movie with kevin costner came out...i was so sad...hated the movie..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love Robin McKinley's books, especially her older ones. Hey, didn't we see that movie together in Pocatello? It came out when we were in college. I LOVE Alan Rickman in it. He's such a delicious villain. They gave him all the best lines and he steals all the scenes. But I didn't care for Costner as Robin Hood; I especially loathed the American accents of Costner and Slater. That ruined it for me.

      Delete
    2. Megan...it did come out while at ISU...but I didn't see it with you...I saw it with a Spanish instructor which will remain nameless in this post...rickman was probably my favorite character, also...the others yuck.....except for the Brian Adams song...

      Delete
    3. Oh my, I didn't know you dated him! Now I'm dying for a good gossip with all the juicy details, but I'll email you. Yeah it was a good song; it sure got worked to death on the radio stations.

      Delete
  2. Glad you sort of mostly kinda liked Scarlett! I am reading the Pyle book right now... it gets the distinct spot as being my first Kindle e-reader book! :) Were you bugged by the "twist" at the end? And...wait... a legend BASED on someone real, right? Of course right!! (I went to this area in England too and for some reason, we did no Robin Hood stuff, I'm still mad about that, but I had yet to discover my LOVE for the story at the time we were there. But I can clearly see in my head the road pointing to Nottingham, and we WENT THE OTHER WAY!!! What WERE we thinking?)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It didn't bug me, 'cause I was kind of expecting it. (You didn't really miss a whole lot. My most distinct memory was the ginormous "Old Oak" with its hugely massive trunk, that the sign said was hundreds of years old. I remember thinking that the trees of Sherwood weren't as tall as I thought they'd be.)

      Delete
  3. I'm not sure I want to read Scarlet after all. I've heard things that made me mad and now hearing you say it relies too much on the love triangle has me more skeptical. I've never read Pippi Longstocking but it sounds like this one is like the Amelia Bedelia books. It always drove me nuts that she never learned either. Maybe that's the point but it irritated me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awww...give Scarlet a try. Maybe those scenes won't bug you as much as they bugged me. It doesn't take that long to read it, and then we can compare notes.

      You aren't missing anything by skipping Pippi.

      Delete
  4. I have heard other good things about Scarlet, so now I must give it a try. And I must confess, I have never read Pippi Longstocking, may be I will give it a try also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do give it a read, Alex. As for Pippi Longstocking, upon further reflection, I think I'm the wrong audience because first of all I'm a grownup, but second of all, slapstick comedy has never appealed to me. I'm not a fan of Laurel and Hardy or the Three Stooges, and others of their ilk. Pippi may appeal more to lovers of slapstick comedy.

      Delete